Chest Strap vs Wrist Devices

ECG accuracy vs passive convenience

The fundamental trade-off in HRV tracking: chest straps offer gold-standard accuracy but require deliberate readings, while wrist devices trade some precision for effortless 24/7 monitoring.

Comparison Overview

Category Polar H10 Whoop 4.0
Accuracy ECG gold standard Good PPG, some noise
Chest strap captures cleaner signal
Convenience Must wear for each reading Automatic, always on
Passive tracking wins for consistency
Cost $90 one-time $30/month ongoing
Chest strap is dramatically cheaper
App Flexibility Works with any app Locked to Whoop
H10 pairs with Elite HRV, HRV4Training, etc.
Overnight Tracking Not practical Automatic sleep HRV
Can't sleep in a chest strap
Trend Consistency Depends on user discipline Guaranteed daily data
Automation beats intention

The Bottom Line

For maximum accuracy on a budget, pair a Polar H10 with Elite HRV and commit to morning readings. For effortless tracking where you just want data without thinking about it, choose a wrist or ring device.

Detailed Reviews

Polar H10

chest strap $90

The accuracy benchmark. If you want the most precise HRV data and don't mind taking deliberate morning readings, the...

Full review

Whoop 4.0

wrist $30/month

Best for serious athletes who want completely passive tracking and don't mind paying monthly. The training load and...

Full review